Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation Bradenton FL & Parrish FL - Sports Medicine physician Florida USA

Bradenton FL 941.755.8819

 Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation
 INTERNATIONAL
 

 

 Sports Medicine Home
 
About Dr. Kochno
 
Clinical Articles
 
Physiatrist
 
Services
 
Kinesiology
 
Patient Info
 
Contact Us
 
Referral Process
 
Professional Staff
 
Press Release
 
Gallery
 Resources

Sports Events

Sports Medicine Overview
 Sports Performance
 Assessments in Sports
 Athletic Assessment
 Stretching
 Athletic Performance
 Kinesiology

Baseball 
 Baseball Pitchers and Hitting

 
Baseball Pitching Velocities

Boxing
 Rehabilitation in Boxing
 Concept of an Executive Medical Boxing Board

Golf
Golf Facts
Golf Conditioning

 
Swing Mechanics
 Faults & Resulting Injuries
 
Shoulder in Sports
 Age and Injury
 
Muscle Memory
 
Science And Golf
 Golfer’s Spine
 
Spine Mechanics
 
Motor & Muscle Memory
 
Biomechanics Of Golf
 
Golf Mechanics - Questions

Football
 Knee Capsule Strain
 Psoas Minor Strain

Basic Anatomical Review
 Spine

 
Shoulder
 
Elbow Joint
 
Radial - Ulnar Joint
 
Wrist Joint, Fingers and Hands
 Hip Joint and Pelvis
 Ankle & Knee

Musculoskeletal Disorders
 Cervical Pain
 
Low Back Pain
 
Joint Mobilization of the Wrist
 
Upper Ankle Sprains
 
Lower Ankle Sprains

Alternative Health
 
Composition of the Human Body
 
Mattes Method®
 
Energy Medicine

Health Care Reform Issues
 Post-Acute Reimbursement System

Motor Vehicle Accidents
 
Overview of Motor Vehicle Accidents

Understanding Stress
Athletic Anxiety

Other
 Role Of Physiatry
 Case Management in Subacute Settings
 The Road To Recovery Following A Stroke
 Viewpoint of Subacute Care
 MindDrive
 MindDrive Study

Posture

Postural Muscle Pain

Posture And Gait:  Kinesiology Application To Motion

Posture Assessment

Chronic Forward Cervical - Head Posture 

Biking Biomechanics and Injuries

Frequently Asked Questions

Drug Lookup

Sarasota Memorial Nursing Home Facility

                                        
New Patient Forms

  Patient Information

Automobile Accident/Injury Form

 

Stretching Overview

 

In an extensive comprehensive review of international research papers concerning indications and effectiveness of different stretching techniques, there appears to be no agreement.  There seem to exist a vast amount of stretching techniques, each with its own described precise application. However, the theoretical models attached to these stretching techniques are based on incomplete scientific study or basis.

Most studies show that each individual technique seems to have some value when the goal is to improve mobility. The majority of the studies identify the short-term effects of stretches on the subjects, but none deal with the long-term effects.

Most authors conclude that the application of their technique improve mobility which is dependent on properties of the connective tissue rather than on neurophysiological mechanisms.

International studies were done and compared results of static, post-isometric and dynamic stretching of the hamstrings. All three stretching methods showed an increase in hamstrings mobility.

The post-isometric method was superior to the static model; however, the largest increment of mobility was gained by the dynamic stretch technique.

Research papers tried to identify what factors resulted in the improvements of mobility. Findings showed that improvement is based on an increased tolerance of the muscle-tendon unit to stretch triggers. Stretching did not change the stretch-tension curve.

The stretching probably caused a mechanical elongation to bring about an effective lengthening of connective tissue; however, this was only maintained over a short period of time.

Another aspect of stretching was reviewed in regards to whether it improved muscle regeneration. Three different stretching techniques were studies which were static stretch, intermittent dynamic stretch and post-isometric relaxation.

The findings showed that static stretching consistently resulted in worsening of muscle regeneration. The post-isometric relaxation had an inconsistent influence, where in some subjects it led to improvement, in others worsening of muscle regeneration.

Finally, intermittent dynamic stretching led to an overall improvement in muscle regeneration. One researcher commented that static stretching may actually slow the regeneration process as it may compress the capillary system and interrupt vascularization. Good vascularization is needed to flush out the metabolic intermediate and end products of forceful muscle activity.

Many therapists who do not have access to objective measuring methods rely on Sherrington Principle of Reciprocal Inhibition to explain their stretching techniques. However, researchers using EMG measuring methods have not observed this reciprocal inhibition. The question arises whether the basic models for neurophysiological reflexes really exist.

Other researchers have remarked that the role of the connective tissue as the most important factor in resistive stretching is overestimated. At the same time, the researchers feel that the resistance of muscles to stretch in underestimated. Muscle imbalances of agonist and antagonist can be explained by Sherrington’s Law of Reciprocal Innervation.

This law implies that a strained or tight muscle will inhibit its antagonist. Therefore, the tight muscles will create weak antagonistic muscles which create a muscle imbalance that adversely affects the normal pattern of muscle movement. Strengthening these tight muscles will have the effect of further increasing the tightness and perpetuating the antagonistic weakness.

Therefore, the concept should be applied that before strengthening exercises are prescribed, muscle tension must be released through stretching prior to any strengthening.  Strengthening already tight muscles will promote further weakness and imbalances.

Facilitating full flexibility of both the agonist and antagonist will allow for a more balanced strengthening and elimination of one muscle group dominance.

Proprioneuromuscular facilitation or PNF is a technique commonly associated with contract-relax stretching (hold-relax) and contract-relax agonist contraction methods. At present, researchers have not found evidence for a mechanism behind the effectiveness of PNF techniques.

PNF stretching techniques use volitional contractions in an attempt to achieve increased range of motion by minimizing the active component of resistance attributed to spinal reflex of pathways.

In the hold-relaxed agonist contraction method, the contraction and relaxation of the muscle to be stretched (antagonist) is followed by a concentric contraction of the muscle opposing the muscle to be stretched (agonist) to inhibit further the antagonist through the alpha-gamma co-activation and reciprocal innervation. 

Although PNF techniques have been based on neurophysiological factors resulting in neuroinhibition of the muscle undergoing stretch, researchers have now disproved that. Researchers point that it is the mechanical factors rather than the stretch factors that are responsible for the increased length and stretching after PNF.

The mechanical response is based on the muscle-tendon unit responding to its viceroelastic properties allowing for length increases without stretching. The elastic component related to stretch are directly related to the applied force while the viscus properties are time dependent and late change dependent, such that the rate of deformation is directly proportional to the applied forces.

Studies have also looked at whether slow repetitive speeds or high explosive speeds improve muscle strength and endurance.  Although slow repetitive speeds have a definite place in the development in hypertrophy and focal muscle endurance, they have minimal improvement in developing absolute or speed strength.

High threshold motor neurons are optimally recruited at high tension, and this requires acceleration. As a rule of thumb, lower the weight over two to three second duration and then launch the weight with as much explosive power as possible to improve muscle building and strength.

The slow twitch fibers respond to higher weights and slower speeds whereas the fast twitch fibers respond more quickly with greater gains with acceleration and lower weights.

 

Should you have any further questions regarding this article, please direct your questions or comments to "Ask the Doctor" section.

 

 

Copyright © 2004 - 2012Taras V. Kochno, M.D.  All Rights Reserved
Board Certified in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

 

HOME

 
Google

 

 

 

 

CLOSE WINDOW

Sports Medicine Home | About Dr. Kochno | Sports Medicine: Clinical Articles | Physiatrist | Services | Kinesiology | Patient Info | Contact | Referral Process  | Press Release | Site Map | Search | Privacy Policy | Blog


 Copyright © 2004 - 2013 Sports Medicine And Rehabilitation, Bradenton FL